NettetIn Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley, 1911, 219 U.S. 467, 31 S.Ct. 265, 55 L.Ed. 297, the Mottleys settled a personal injury case against the railroad in return for passes entitling them to free travel on the railroad for the rest of their lives. Summary of this case from Consol. Rail v. Metro-North Comm. R. NettetWendell Mottley (1941–), Trinidad & Tobago economist, politician, government official, athlete and Credit Suisse investment banker. Yale and Cambridge graduate. …
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Mottley Case Brief for Law School
NettetLouisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley. Facts: The plaintiffs agreed to release their claims for damages against the defendant railroad in return for lifetime passes on the railroad. 36 years later, the defendant refused to … Nettet3 'The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, in consideration that E. L. Mottley and wife, Annie E. Mottley, have this day released said company from all damages or claims for damages for injuries received by them on the 7th day of September, 1871, in consequence of a collision of trains on the railroad of said company at Randolph's … lego harry potter cherries
Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Erasmus Mottley, No. 246
NettetWendell Mottley (1941–), Trinidad & Tobago economist, politician, government official, athlete and Credit Suisse investment banker. Yale and Cambridge graduate. Represented Trinidad and Tobago at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mottley. 1908 US Supreme Court case and source of the well pleaded complaint rule. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that under the existing statutory scheme, federal question jurisdiction could not be predicated on a plaintiff's anticipation that the defendant would raise a federal statute as … Se mer The Mottleys, Erasmus and Annie, were a husband and wife who had been injured in a train wreck on September 7, 1871, in Jefferson County, Kentucky. In exchange for releasing the railroad from liability, they were compensated … Se mer Following the dismissal of their case, the Mottleys brought a similar action in Kentucky state court. The state court held for them, and ordered the railroad to issue the passes. The railroad appealed to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, Kentucky's highest court at the … Se mer • Works related to Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley at Wikisource • Text of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Se mer The Supreme Court, sua sponte, questioned the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, transforming the issue into whether this was a case that could have been brought in … Se mer The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Moody, dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. There was no diversity of citizenship, and no grounds for federal question jurisdiction except … Se mer • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 211 • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 219 Se mer NettetAs the result of a collision in Kentucky of railroad trains belonging to the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, which operated various lines extending through that … lego harry potter clock tower castle